The Australian
Journal
of Anthropology
Official
Journal of
The Australian Anthropological Society
ISSN: 1035-8811
Volume 16, Number 3, December 2005
SPECIAL ISSUE 17
Australian Anthropologies of the Environment
Guest Editors: Jane Mulcock, Celmara Pocock and Yann Toussaint
| Introduction:
Current Directions in Australian Anthropologies of the Environment |
281-293 |
| Environmental
anthropology is an expanding field in |
|
| An Indigenous Philosophical Ecology: Situating the
Human |
294-305 |
| Can Indigenous ecological knowledge contribute to major debates in Western science and philosophy? I argue that it offers a ‘philosophical ecology’ that works synergistically with Western eco-philosophy and some streams of ecological science. This paper takes up the challenge offered by Val Plumwood: that anthropology can contribute to the work of re-situating the human. It examines an ecological philosophy of mutual benefits, and shows patterns, and a broader meta-pattern, in which life is both for itself and for others, and in which connectivity and stability are achieved through densely recursive benefits. I identify these and other contexts as areas for further dialogue. |
|
| Forests as Spiritually Significant Places: Nature,
Culture and ‘Belonging’ in |
306-320 |
| The
spiritual significance of forests is explored, based on interviews with
people involved in disputes that led to the signing of the Western Australian
Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) in 1999. Included are reflections from
individuals involved in forestry, tourism, farming, and in the environmental
conservation movement. Although the conflict between these groups has
been emphasised in previous accounts of the RFA process, this analysis
focuses on points of similarity, namely, ideas about Australian attachments
to land. A significant proportion of interviewees compared their own
feelings of spiritual or sentimental connection to the forests with
the kind of attachments they thought Aboriginal Australians might have
to their homelands. This leads us to consider feelings of belonging
and attachment to place in relation to controversial debates about nature,
culture and identity in settler-descendant societies such as |
|
| Managing the Myth of Ecotourism: A Queensland Case
Study |
321-334 |
| Although
social anthropologists are taking an increased interest in tourism in
|
|
| ‘Blue Lagoons and Coconut Palms’: The Creation of a
Tropical Idyll in |
335-349 |
| The Great Barrier Reef is regarded as an ‘Australian icon’. It is an internationally recognised World Heritage site managed for its ‘natural’ values. However, it is a location where visitors rarely enjoy Australian landscapes. This paper contrasts the sensuous engagement of past visitors with contemporary tourist experiences. Analysis of historic and contemporary visual and written materials suggests that tourist landscapes of the Reef have been transformed significantly during the 20th century. In particular, experiences of Reef islands characterised by Australian bush have been displaced by those of a generic Pacific location. The coconut palm, as a symbol of earthly paradise, has played an important role in realising both an imagined landscape and the physical transformation of tourist locations. Whereas the tourism industry is often regarded as responsible for the promulgation of such generic images, this study suggests that they are the product of a shared imagination to which both the tourism industry and tourists subscribe. |
|
| Crisis of Meanings: Divergent Experiences and Perceptions
of the Marine Environment in Victoria, |
350-365 |
| The oceans of the world are regularly depicted as under threat from human exploitation with the problem portrayed as being of ‘global’ concern. In a world market characterised by the division of labour, many of those who eat fish do so without directly experiencing the ocean as a domain of productive utility. Rather, their encounters are with representations that depict the ‘natural’ world as an aesthetic object of contemplation, and environmentalist discourses that identify human activities as threatening marine ecosystems. So prevalent is this experience that tangible institutions, such as state fisheries management bodies, have emerged, acting to reinforce the ontology of this ‘contemplated’ ocean, giving weight to the illusion that humans can, and should, appreciate it only from afar. In this representation, commercial fishers are regularly depicted as transgressing a ‘natural’ boundary between humans and the environment. It is when the world is simultaneously encountered as an object of consumptive utility and aesthetic utility that the human role in the environment becomes ambiguous and a sense of crisis arises. This paper investigates disjunctions in experiences and understandings that contribute to environmental anxiety, and debates over the appropriate use of the ocean. |
|
| Water Works: Agency and Creativity in the Mitchell
River Catchment |
366-381 |
| This paper outlines some of the theoretical developments in cultural anthropology that have been particularly useful in elucidating human engagements with land and resources. It examines some of the meanings and values encoded in water by a range of water using groups along the Mitchell River in northern Queensland, and their diverse ideas of what constitutes environmental ‘productivity’. Exploring some of the cultural and sub-cultural beliefs and practices within the catchment area, it considers how these intersect with ecological issues; social issues; and with local conflicts over the ownership, control and management of water. |
|
| Debating Biodiversity: Threatened Species Conservation
and Scientific Values |
382-393 |
| This paper explores some aspects of the cultural logic of conservation biology and threatened species conservation recovery projects from the perspectives of environmental anthropology and science studies. Responses of the scientific community to recent ‘re-discoveries’ of species believed to have become extinct are considered within current decision making models that emphasise landscape scale restoration over single species recovery projects. In particular, this paper considers responses to the proposition that dedicating resources towards recovery projects for critically endangered species is inconsistent with a rational approach to biodiversity conservation. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork, I demonstrate that debates over the value of threatened species recovery projects cause many scientists to reflect on the ethical responsibilities and emotional attachments that led them to act as advocates for threatened species. |
|
| Obituary to Marie Reay, 1922-2004 |
394-396 |
| Letterbox |
397-400 |
| Book Reviews |
|
| Rohan
Bastin The Domains of Constant Excess: Plural Worship at the Mannesvaram
Temples in |
401 |
| Daniel Miller (ed.) Home Possessions: Material Culture Behind Closed Doors [R. Wilk] |
404 |
| Sujata
Patel, Josodhara Bagchi and Krishna Rai (eds) Thinking Social Science
in |
405 |